Mentioned before, the big reset most countries need began in the US & will reach our shores. Political parties will have to be clear, precise & up front about their organisation structure, their values, standards, goals & ideology. NOT THEIR CORE GOALS to allow massive wriggle room to do the opposite for political expediency but actually map out who really owns & controls their party & what hills they're prepared to die upon. It was starting before Trump but was a whimper trying to gain volume. Trump tried to drain the swamp & although he was in most ways the perfectly wrong person for that job, he did push good, perhaps timid people aside and breached the locked door. He's gone & the those good timids have gained their voice & their audience. The pendulum is swinging & resistence will be on both sides of politics.
There is no honest "Sensible centre" they're generally money seeking void fillers who are less likely to join major parties, sense the shift & go to the new push to make money & fame. They have to be vetted & only those with good STATESMANSHIP traits be encouraged to take up the cudgels.
Meanwhile in Australia, its beginning too. Identity Politics & Intersectionality is being called out as the vile poisonous cancer that it is. Lib/Nats & Labor are beginning to come under attack for being theatre props and the TEALS are just intellectual corruption via the side door. I mistrust them like serious sunburn. Many are of of the under 55 think-they're-affluent-and-influential-brigade. Some may well be Chardonnay Socialists, some may well see the huge opportunity to be crafty a different way as younger people, some younger people fall for thecurrently popular spell of New-Socialism, Democratic Socialism.
The shift here really won't come until all parties get their governance right & the values tattooed onto their foreheads & stop morphing into the next trending version of whatever-gets-me-elected-and-wins-government. The recalibration in the Political Classes, the ruling class, the reform of the bureacracy & reinstalling fully open and adhered to values will take some years, due the fierce opposition by those with hands on the gears, the wheel & the pedals. Its very clear, we need to return the idea of the parliament being full of actual representatives who represent. Parties controlled totally by lay members. A Public Service that serves the public, not ruling them & the people deciding where & how big or small the public service needs to be.- Seek out as many like minded people as possible who want a party that is what its supposed to be & serves the lay members intentions.
- Once you have enough people, invite the party MPs of the party you'd be ok joining.
- When they're there, tell them you're all considering joining a party, possibly their party. Get them to outline there party, their values & standards. Then ask the questions...
- Question 1 - What happens to those who fail to hold those values or standards?
- Question 2 - Set out their Governance Structure, each level and/or official's fiduciary duty & the process & penalties for lapsing. That's all levels...branch President to State President, all elected officials, committeess, Members of Parliament and who they actually report to.
- Question 3 - Copy of the constitution. See if it compares favourably to what they described when answering Question 2.
- Question 4 - Ask what happens to those who breach the constituion, are they suspended pending an inquiry & is the decision, the fate of the alleged breacher able to be sent to the organisations AGM if the accused and/or lay members are not statisfied.
- Question 5 - When was the Constitution last reviewed and last time it was altered. If it's 5 years or more, they have already hit a mark against their name & suggests there is a highly likelihood of very poor governance & the ability for crafty person or persons to manipulate & corrupt the system for gain outside the party/organisation's values.
- Question 6 - People resigning from the party, do they have exit interviews? They must or whatever intellectural bankruptcy/corruption is going to continue. If someone leaves just because they didn't get their way...prove it & if so, so be it...fair bump, play on and best regards.
- Question 7 - Do committees have performance reviews? Do MPs have regular performance reviews?
- Question 8 - Who is the board? This is serious. They are the ones who are legally responsible for decisions being made. Not a small group on the side not reporting but instead endearing theatrical performances to get people squared away so to be quickly ignored. These are the people who are legally responsible for the decision making, they are the decision makers, they properly report their decisions. They do all the STRATEGIC THINKING, the executive/management do all the STRATEGIC PLANNING & then regularly report back progress to the board who then assess the progress, performance or lack thereof of the executive/management. If this is lacking...a political party will be controlled by Members of Parliament or a faction or a corporate psychopath/s...or all of the above.
- Question 9 - Ask why the person or persons came to you meeting. It should be the State President and hopefully the nearest Branch President. If its a local MP or the Political Party's leader that's fine but Organisational Governance is not their wheelhouse, parliament is. They should stick in their lane & not comment on internal governance or any of the above questions or its a red flag. Serious red flag if they seem to be the big wheel running everything. If there is a governance problem from the above questions, you cannot ask the political leader what they're going to do to solve it. It's not their sphere of influence beyond approaching the state president, his/her other elected officals & asking for change. There must be a seperation of the Party & the Organisation and of the two, only the organisation is superior.
No comments:
Post a Comment