No, Seriously...What is a woman?

"What Is A Woman?" - Matt Walsh first coined the iconic question or at least cemented in the lexicon by producing a must watch film with that question as the title. 

It is actually a very rational question that shines a bright beams of fresh sunlight on the whole premise of why state & federal governments have a "Minister of Women's Interests"

So “anyone who identifies as a woman" means being a woman is chosen social sub culture identity like a goth, hippy, metalhead. It now means the gender wage gap is immaterial. You can chose to be a Yuppy or a Goth or a Man or a Woman & have the corresponding average earning capacity that goes along with that identity choice...maybe you'll do better than the average or a lot worse but in any case, you choose & if one is worse than the other it reflects your choice...so not the problem for anyone else to fix. Logic (although its remarkably absent in Identity Politics) would suggest there will be a Minister for Goth Interests soon & Hippy Interests and so on.

Stressed point - On this the feminists are strangely dead quiet.

Now is this is all about the Identity a person chooses that logically means “Anything” is viable as a chosen identity choice in which case if you identify as a cat, let the authorities know if you don't have an owner & are no a registered & chipped animal. You can be taken to the pound, be assigned a vet for your care until you’re neutered & await pet adoption by whomever wants you & is happy to pay your pet licence. Spoiler alert…a lot are not adopted & get put down but hey…

Humans are top of the animal kingdom so, hang in there til PETA saves the day. Although that’s a political group, they don’t keep or rehome any animals. As a cat you have to be an animal, do not have personhood, citizenship, voting rights, no money or assets...so you're either a licenced pet or you're a feral. Sound ridiculous doesn't it, can't compare it with LGBTQI+... But cat or transman transwoman its all only a self chosen identity. It's all the same under this nonsensical illogical premise. I mean you created this derangement that doesn’t work. Embrace it for all its stupidity If you cannot define a woman as anything other than those that choose to live as the non defined identity callen women, its got no value beyond a socially constructed self identity choice. You don't get extra rights. If you do, Goths do, Surfies do, Metalheads do, Bikers do, Hippies do and they ALL need to be graded along with Men & Women on the gender pay gap scale...no one has any prominence over another. I not many members of Parliament say women are those who live as women. Many. They hate & avoid the "What is a woman? question like acid covered plague nowadays...now they know they strapped a whole bunch of logic grenades to their chest, pulled all the pins & threw the pins at those who question them. They have argued their way into logical quicksand with pockets full of brick pavers & wearing big old cement shoes. Which also runs another big into view to sit on them whilst they sink in the quicksand... Sex & gender no longer exists. It must no longer exist in toilets...currently there has been a push for that & in some places its happening. But the even bigger one, it must no longer can exist in sports. We cannot have any more men, nor women brackets in sport or we have to open it to all self chosen identities. Who will end up with the Olympic Record for Bhuddist Goth Women's Javelin OR is it humans against humans and no sub culture social construct identity isn't used? None in or all in...can't be preferential & biased or oppress some with exclusion. Currently Identity Policis is destroying women's sports Stressed point - On this the feminists are strangely dead quiet. I know of a number of sitting MPs that have this logical dilemma. They are super strong feminists & yet say those who live as a woman are women. Strangely this means death to any sports endeavour most young girls might aspire to. They most likely are going to be competing against anyone who "lives as a woman" even if they were born male & became and lived as relatively strong males for most of their life. If someone was truly a feminist they would not accept that a woman is anyone (born male or female) who lives as a female. They would be living the traditional line. Stressed point - On this the feminists are strangely dead quiet. As are the Members of Parliament who like to remain in a vague cloud & play verbal distraction games. I should remind you, they're on a 3-4 year contract & they have to pretend to be doing you well whether they do anything or not ro get re-elected. Now its possible those feminists have fully embraced "woman" as being a self chosen, social construct identity like goth, hippy, surfie, metal head...and there's no political need to argue any debatable oppression if its a chosen identity. No gender, no females, no feminism, no feminists...that's logically making a lot of sense but I think its more likely to be chosen silence due to the embarassing logic implosion they have stapled to their forehead.

This is what Identity Politics is. It is a gross & debilitating cancer on society.

So with that in mind, you might want to check this video of the Queensland Minister for Women's Interests...  https://twitter.com/i/status/1655893546933837831